Urban Planning and Design
Research Centre: Centre of Urban Studies and Urban Planning
Principal Investigator: Mandy H.M. Lau
Source of Funding: GRF
This project examines policy controversies over the inadequate housing problem in Hong Kong. While there is an extensive literature on slum housing in developing countries, there are relatively fewer studies on inadequate housing in the developed world. In reality, inadequate housing also exists in highly developed cities, such as Hong Kong, where tens of thousands of households live in overcrowded sub-divided flats.
The first phase of this project is to outline the changing visibility of the inadequate housing problem in Hong Kong, through examining statistical data and news reports. In particular, it attempts to explain the rapid entrance of this problem onto the political agenda over the last few years.
The second phase of the project applies the method of framing analysis, to analyse why policy controversies emerged, despite consensus over the severity of the inadequate housing problem. The framing method goes beyond conventional policy analysis methods, which tend to focus on the efficiency or cost-effectiveness of different policy interventions. It acknowledges the prevalence of controversies in public policymaking, since policy actors have divergent interpretations about the causes of a problem, and hence the appropriateness of different policy responses.
The final phase of the project involves interviewing policy actors, to examine how framing strategies interact with the material resources and socio-political power possessed by different actors, and how the local policymaking context influences the choice of particular courses of action.
Overall, the project seeks to deepen our understanding of the role of framing strategies in the policymaking process. This approach helps explain why particular policies emerge in response to the inadequate housing problem, and why controversies persist. In addition, it provides insights into possible strategies for reframing, such as the generation of new frames that could potentially bridge the divide between adversaries, and could pave the way towards more consensual solutions.